Artificial Intelligence

Nov
10
Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 banner comparing Artificial Analysis index scores and cost per task across effort levels, alongside Fable 5.1.

Claude Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2: what do they cost and who can use them?

Token prices fell 20%, but max-effort runs cost twice as much per task on one independent index, while low effort scored above Opus 5.5 high for less. Plans, Mythos access and the API changes that can break existing agents.
9 min read
Nov
06
Reported Qwen MATH-500 scores: 7.9% unedited and 48.1% edited with thinking on; 44.0% unedited with thinking off in a separate test.

Can an LLM improve another model by editing its weights?

A reported math-score jump from 7.9% to 48.1% came from fixing repetitive reasoning. An independent Claude Opus 5.5 run found another repair, while stronger unedited baselines challenge the size of the gain.
7 min read
Oct
29
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 59 on Artificial Analysis Index v5.0, ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 at 58 and Argon at 50. Carbon’s rollout starts with cyber defenders; Opus and Argon are available through

Gemini 4 Carbon tops Artificial Analysis Index v5.0 as developers wait for access

Argon's introductory pricing ends November 30. Use its paid API to build an evaluation now, then compare Carbon on the same tasks when access expands.
5 min read
Oct
27
GPT-6.1 Terra and Sol compared on token prices, task costs and total output tokens.

GPT-6.1 Terra halves Sol's token prices, with smaller savings on one index

Terra targets work across documents and apps. Its cost depends on request size and reasoning effort, plus the work needed to check and repair the result.
7 min read
Oct
21
Voxtral 3 banner showing a listen–reason–speak pipeline, pricing from $0.04/min with Mistral Small 4, and enterprise phone support limited to inbound calls.

Voxtral 3 adds voice agents from $0.04/min, with inbound-only phone support

Mistral claims sub-second replies. Its own tests show a speed-accuracy tradeoff: transcription errors rise as streaming delays shrink. Voxtral 2 integrations also lose word timestamps.
4 min read
Oct
15
Jev announcement banner showing a box around a ball and another box in an empty image, illustrating why apps need a separate presence check.

Jev gets experimental image input, and Jev 1.14 can locate objects in images

Ask Jev 1.14 where something is in a photo and it returns a box around it. If the thing isn't in the photo, it still returns a box, so apps should also ask whether it's there.
3 min read
Oct
13
Meta banner comparing AA index scores at Max effort: Opus 5.5 with default fallback scores 58, Muse Wonder Full scores 56 with no public API, and Muse Wonder scores 52 with API access.

Meta's Muse Wonder Full gets close to Opus 5.5, with a subscription catch

Regular Muse Wonder costs the same $4/$20 per million input/output tokens as Opus 5.5, while scoring six points lower on an independent index. Its measured cost per benchmark task is lower, and Meta says it has fixed unusually fast quota usage on Muse Code.
3 min read
Oct
08
Claude Haiku 5.5 pricing chart showing input rates rising from $0.10 to $0.50 and output rates from $0.50 to $2.50 per million tokens for prompts over 100K tokens.

Claude Haiku 5.5 cuts prices, with a 100K-token threshold

Input pricing starts at $0.10 per million tokens. A short answer to a prompt over 100K tokens pays $2.50 per million output tokens. Cache rates also rise fivefold above the threshold.
3 min read
Sep
30
OpenAI DevDay 2026 graphic with a status board showing GPT-6.1 Sol in the API, Work and Codex; dots rolling out; and other announcements in beta, preview or planned.

What OpenAI announced at DevDay 2026 and what is available now

OpenAI's tests put GPT-6.1 Sol near Astra on coding and computer use at GPT-6 Sol's prices of $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. Dots bring a cloud computer to eligible Pro and Business Premium users, while Agents API computer use is in public beta.
7 min read
Sep
29
Claude Sonnet 5.5 headline beside a chart showing Anthropic’s up to 30% lower task cost and Artificial Analysis’s about 50% higher result at max effort, from separate evaluations.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is faster, but task cost depends on effort

Anthropic claims up to 30% lower cost per task. Artificial Analysis measured $7.60 per task at max effort, about 50% above Sonnet 5. Two request settings that worked with Sonnet 5 now return 400 errors.
3 min read